from cnet.com
Users on Apple's support forums say their iPhone 5S units are turning a mean shade of blue and then rebooting.
The infamous "blue screen of death" seems to have expanded from Windows PCs to iPhones.
Several iPhone 5S owners report that their phones are turning a mean shade of blue and then restarting. Users chiming in on the Apple Support Communities and MacRumors forums said the problem occurs when they use the Numbers app in Apple's iWork suite, which comes free with the new iPhones. But a couple of people report that it also happens when using the ESPN ScoreCenter app.
The bug apparently has been present since the phone launched. One of the forum messages is dated September 21, the day after the 5S went on sale. One possible remedy, at least for users running into BSODs with iWork, is to disable iCloud syncing for the iWork suite, according to The Verge.
CNET contacted Apple for comment and will update the story with any further details.
Friday, October 11, 2013
Sunday, September 22, 2013
Saturday, September 21, 2013
Security holes unearthed in Apple's iOS7
from bbc.co.uk
Two security vulnerabilities have been discovered in Apple's new mobile operating system, less than 24
hours after its launch.
One flaw concerns a user's ability to recover their data if a device has been stolen. The much-vaunted "Find my iPhone" feature can be disabled be a thief simply by putting the iPhone or iPad into airplane mode, preventing the device from communicating.
In iOS7 this can be done even when the phone is locked with a passcode, as the voice-activated assistant Siri can be instructed to carry out the task.
The other flaw is potentially even more serious - allowing users' email and social networking accounts to be hijacked even when the user has locked and password-protected their phone,
In this video the BBC's North America technology correspondent Richard Taylor explains the security glitch and a way to prevent it.
Apple has said it takes security "very seriously" and will issue a fix in a future software update.
- Yeah right.
Two security vulnerabilities have been discovered in Apple's new mobile operating system, less than 24 hours after its launch.
One flaw concerns a user's ability to recover their data if a device has been stolen. The much-vaunted "Find my iPhone" feature can be disabled be a thief simply by putting the iPhone or iPad into airplane mode, preventing the device from communicating.
In iOS7 this can be done even when the phone is locked with a passcode, as the voice-activated assistant Siri can be instructed to carry out the task.
The other flaw is potentially even more serious - allowing users' email and social networking accounts to be hijacked even when the user has locked and password-protected their phone,
In this video the BBC's North America technology correspondent Richard Taylor explains the security glitch and a way to prevent it.
Apple has said it takes security "very seriously" and will issue a fix in a future software update.
- Yeah right.
Friday, September 20, 2013
iOS 7 Lock Screen Vulnerability Discovered
Vulnerabilities in Apple’s iOS lock screens have become a fixture of new iOS releases over the past few years, and iOS 7 is not exempt. A new method for bypassing the passcode on a lock screen has been discovered by idle hands and reported by Forbes’ Andy Greenberg. Update below.The lock screen bypass method involves sliding up Control Center, tapping on the timer button and holding down the power button until the cancel option comes up. You then tap on the cancel button then double-tap the home button. This gives you access to the multitasking UI. While most apps are locked out, the Camera option is accessible.
This allows you to access the camera interface, but with the ability to scroll through all of the owner’s photos, not just the ones shot in the time since the phone was last locked — in the manner that the camera has worked for some time now.
Not only can you scroll through the photos, but you can also tap on the share button to send photos out via email or social channels like Twitter or Facebook. So once you’re in you can post photos to Flickr or send them via email. Though Greenberg characterizes this as ‘hijacking’ those accounts, that seems a bit dramatic. Still, there is potential for embarrassment or harm if sensitive (ahem) photos get stolen or shared out through your social accounts.
The bypass method has been verified by us to work properly and to not be overly difficult to execute. It took me about three tries to get it right on an iPhone 5 running iOS 7. As Greenberg notes, it’s hard to tell whether this works on an iPhone 5c or iPhone 5s as of yet. Of note: once you’re on the share sheet, you can choose a contact to send the item to, technically gaining access to the contact list (but not their details) of the device’s owner.
Note that this vulnerability is incredibly easy to prevent for now. Just visit Settings>Control Center and toggle off ‘Access on Lock Screen’ to patch it up.
The discovery was made by Jose Rodriguez, a soldier in Spain’s Canary Islands, who has a history of discovering these tricky bypass methods. His secret? Plenty of time waiting in cars in his former job as a driver for government officials.
With past vulnerabilities, a software fix has come in a ‘point’ release of iOS 7. iOS 7.0.1 is already floating out there and contains a fix for Apple’s TouchID fingerprint scanner. So any fix for this would likely come in iOS 7.0.2 or later.
Apple has added a variety of security features to iOS 7, including Activation Lock, which renders stolen phones unusable, even if they’re wiped. But it looks like it needs another lock screen audit just to be sure.
Update: Apple Spokesperson Trudy Muller told TechCrunch that “Apple takes user security very seriously. We are aware of this issue, and will deliver a fix in a future software update.”
So, yes, the fix for this little bug will come in a future point release of iOS 7. (Always in a future release...)
Thursday, September 12, 2013
Little Girl Finds Security Flaw in iPhone 5S Fingerprint Scanner
from mashable.com
Apple's new iPhone 5S features the latest in phone-unlocking security: a fingerprint scanner.
The company announced that its Touch ID fingerprint sensor would read fingerprints at a highly detailed level, boasting a capacitive sensor at 170 microns thin and a 500 ppi resolution. It's James Bond-level technology that could revolutionize lock screens.
While some rejoiced at the advancement in phone security, one Reddit user's clever daughter knew there was a simple flaw in this new tech.
Redditor iZeeHunter posted the image Wednesday, along with the caption: "The new iPhone 5S provides unmatched security with its new Fingerprint lock, which makes your personal data even harder to reach!"
Apple should probably hire the little girl pictured, who is wearing a mischievously adorable grin, to examine future products for security breaches.
Apple's new iPhone 5S features the latest in phone-unlocking security: a fingerprint scanner.
The company announced that its Touch ID fingerprint sensor would read fingerprints at a highly detailed level, boasting a capacitive sensor at 170 microns thin and a 500 ppi resolution. It's James Bond-level technology that could revolutionize lock screens.
While some rejoiced at the advancement in phone security, one Reddit user's clever daughter knew there was a simple flaw in this new tech.
![]() |
| "You call that security?" |
Apple should probably hire the little girl pictured, who is wearing a mischievously adorable grin, to examine future products for security breaches.
Wednesday, September 11, 2013
Apple releases new iPhones to collective yawn
from itwire.com
The release of a new version of Apple’s iPhone was once a big deal. But that was when Apple was setting the agenda. Now it is playing catchup – and failing.
Apple’s two new iPhones, announced this morning Australian time, have been greeted with an underwhelming response, and rightly so.
As widely predicted, there are two new iPhones, the 5C and the 5S. The 5C was to have been a lower cost version of the existing iPhone 5, but it is nothing more than the existing phone with a shiny plastic (sorry – polycarbonate) case and a new version of the operating system. And it is still expensive.
The new 5S, the premium model, is an even bigger disappointment – same screen size, same Lightning connector, same memory, same ridiculously high price. It gets a faster processor (of course) new colour (gold, known as “champagne”), the new 64 bit iOS (which will make no immediate difference), and a slightly better camera (not more pixels, but bigger pixels) with a smart flash that makes skin tones better.
And more games – just what we need.
That’s it. No bigger screen, no amazing new features, no Android killer. What was Apple thinking? Does it really believe these minor improvements are sufficient? It’s hard to imagine it doing less than it has. Yawn.
With these disappointing devices Apple will continue to lose market share, and deservedly so. It knows it is facing a great challenge from Android, and especially Samsung. But it has done nothing. Has its arrogance turned to hubris? Has it learnt nothing?
These new phones are very disappointing. Apple defined the iPhone market, then set the agenda with
successive new and impressive models. Now it is boring.
Sorry Steve.
How quickly things change.
The release of a new version of Apple’s iPhone was once a big deal. But that was when Apple was setting the agenda. Now it is playing catchup – and failing.
Apple’s two new iPhones, announced this morning Australian time, have been greeted with an underwhelming response, and rightly so.
As widely predicted, there are two new iPhones, the 5C and the 5S. The 5C was to have been a lower cost version of the existing iPhone 5, but it is nothing more than the existing phone with a shiny plastic (sorry – polycarbonate) case and a new version of the operating system. And it is still expensive.
The new 5S, the premium model, is an even bigger disappointment – same screen size, same Lightning connector, same memory, same ridiculously high price. It gets a faster processor (of course) new colour (gold, known as “champagne”), the new 64 bit iOS (which will make no immediate difference), and a slightly better camera (not more pixels, but bigger pixels) with a smart flash that makes skin tones better.
And more games – just what we need.
That’s it. No bigger screen, no amazing new features, no Android killer. What was Apple thinking? Does it really believe these minor improvements are sufficient? It’s hard to imagine it doing less than it has. Yawn.
With these disappointing devices Apple will continue to lose market share, and deservedly so. It knows it is facing a great challenge from Android, and especially Samsung. But it has done nothing. Has its arrogance turned to hubris? Has it learnt nothing?
![]() |
| "Wait, wasn't Apple cool at one point?" |
successive new and impressive models. Now it is boring.
Sorry Steve.
How quickly things change.
Thursday, August 29, 2013
Unpatched Mac bug gives attackers “super user” status by going back in time
from arstechnica.com
The authentication bypass vulnerability was reported in March and resides in a Unix component known as sudo. While the program is designed to require a password before granting "super user" privileges such as access to other users' files, the bug makes it possible to obtain that sensitive access by resetting the computer clock to January 1, 1970. That date is known in computing circles as the Unix epoch, and it represents the beginning of time as measured by the operating system and most of the applications that run on it. By invoking the sudo command and then resetting the date, computers can be tricked into turning over root privileges without a password.
Developers of Metasploit, an open-source software framework that streamlines the exploitation of vulnerabilities in a wide array of operating systems and applications, recently added a module that makes it easier to exploit the sudo vulnerability on Macs. The addition capitalizes on the fact that all versions of OS X from 10.7 through the current 10.8.4 remain vulnerable. While the bug also affected many Linux distributions, most of those require a root password to change the computer clock. Macs impose no such restrictions on clock changes thanks to the systemsetup binary.
Mac users should realize that an attacker must satisfy a variety of conditions before being able to exploit this vulnerability. For one, the end-user who is logged in must already have administrator privileges. And for another, the user must have successfully run sudo at least once in the past. And of course, the attacker must already have either physical or remote shell access to the target machine. In other words: this exploit can't be used in the kind of drive-by webpage attacks that last year infected some 650,000 Macs with the Flashback malware. This doesn't mean it's a non-issue though, since the exploit can be used in concert with other attacks to magnify the damage they can do.
"The bug is significant because it allows any user-level compromise to become root, which in turn exposes things like clear-text passwords from Keychain and makes it possible for the intruder to install a permanent rootkit," HD Moore, the founder of the Metasploit project and the chief research officer at security firm Rapid7, told Ars. "I believe Apple should take this more seriously but am not surprised with the slow response given their history of responding to vulnerabilities in the open source tools they package."
Apple representatives didn't respond to an e-mail seeking comment for this post.
Researchers have made it easier to exploit a five-month-old security flaw that allows penetration testers and less-ethical hackers to gain nearly unfettered "root" access to Macs over which they already have limited control.
The authentication bypass vulnerability was reported in March and resides in a Unix component known as sudo. While the program is designed to require a password before granting "super user" privileges such as access to other users' files, the bug makes it possible to obtain that sensitive access by resetting the computer clock to January 1, 1970. That date is known in computing circles as the Unix epoch, and it represents the beginning of time as measured by the operating system and most of the applications that run on it. By invoking the sudo command and then resetting the date, computers can be tricked into turning over root privileges without a password.
Developers of Metasploit, an open-source software framework that streamlines the exploitation of vulnerabilities in a wide array of operating systems and applications, recently added a module that makes it easier to exploit the sudo vulnerability on Macs. The addition capitalizes on the fact that all versions of OS X from 10.7 through the current 10.8.4 remain vulnerable. While the bug also affected many Linux distributions, most of those require a root password to change the computer clock. Macs impose no such restrictions on clock changes thanks to the systemsetup binary.
Mac users should realize that an attacker must satisfy a variety of conditions before being able to exploit this vulnerability. For one, the end-user who is logged in must already have administrator privileges. And for another, the user must have successfully run sudo at least once in the past. And of course, the attacker must already have either physical or remote shell access to the target machine. In other words: this exploit can't be used in the kind of drive-by webpage attacks that last year infected some 650,000 Macs with the Flashback malware. This doesn't mean it's a non-issue though, since the exploit can be used in concert with other attacks to magnify the damage they can do.
"The bug is significant because it allows any user-level compromise to become root, which in turn exposes things like clear-text passwords from Keychain and makes it possible for the intruder to install a permanent rootkit," HD Moore, the founder of the Metasploit project and the chief research officer at security firm Rapid7, told Ars. "I believe Apple should take this more seriously but am not surprised with the slow response given their history of responding to vulnerabilities in the open source tools they package."
Apple representatives didn't respond to an e-mail seeking comment for this post.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





